Not A Real Debate

Written by Omar Fernandez

I'm reading spin where some folks, mostly libs, are saying this was not a "real" debate. Tells me they are scared because their fool lost. Regardless, whether it was a "debate" or not in the classic sense is totally irrelevant. It is currently the best platform we have to judge "presidential appearance". Similar to the fact that the two party exclusivity of our elections may not be the perfect sys
tem, it is the best we have for now.

After all, American voters are, on the whole, woefully uninformed and ignorant of a candidates platform policies and very often even specific issues that have a direct influence on them personally. Witness some of the postings on FB. Applies to both sides btw.

So, that being said, because many are mostly devoid of rational, discretionary and intelligent reasoning, they will fall back to their default sense of primordial intelligence and vote for whomever "looks more presidential" regardless of that candidates answers or who actually "won" the "debate". Using this reasoning, Romney would be the logical winner of the election.